/horror/ - The Occult Deception

Conspiracy, Memes, Research

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


>tfw your mom casually tells you she knew a shriner Anonymous 04/08/2018 (Sun) 15:36:42 [Preview] No. 1645
I asked my mother if she knew a shriner, because I know that she's a dumb matrix prole, and she said "yeah, my (childhood best friend here)'s father was a shriner. Ask what he said it was. "Oh, it's just a men's club that does good deeds." I ask if he had a "cool red hat." She replies "yeah, anon, and it had a cool black tassle."
whatthefuck.jpg
What do I do?
Pic entirely unrelated.


Anonymous 04/08/2018 (Sun) 23:15:23 [Preview] No.1646 del
was it her childhoods bff or yours?
Its extremely common. I have found actual pins in my fucking house and I hope my immediate family is not masons I am kind of afraid to think about it. I'm sure a couple of my relatives are shriners they do that "juss a boyz club" shit when you ask about it. A lot of times people are sworn in as masons just to be a shriner and they just stop paying their blue lodge dues and just go off in the sand. A lot of fucking people are shriners and never go to lodges they use it as like a bar. In arkansas you dont even have to be a mason to get in the shrine. Its not something to worry about unless they are trying to run you through and make you a mason just to be a shriner. Its fucking scary. As far as trying to redpill them consider the powerlevel meme. I try to point people towards this video https://hooktube.com/watch?v=VKpQljw6dd0

You can just show her the video of the shriner calling himself lucifer and virtuous. Its on youtube search "shriner lucifer" its also in the webm thread. But you dont want your mom talking to her friend about conspiracies these people look like jim with goatees and shit and you see like 10 jims a day.Listen to webms with earbuds do not blare antimasonic propaganda willy nilly this is a real conspiracy and we are living in 1984 basically so this is how you start to put the pieces together.

As for a shock dont be shocked I am pretty a lot of people I knew im my life are shrine concordant people. On the basic level its fine.Shriners have like hunting clubs and fishing boating clubs and gun clubs they call them like the Springfield gun club or the local gun association but they are shriners and this is how its used to make covens too btw.

all shriners swear oaths to allah its extremely easy to make a case against them but dont push it she might not be able to understand like with people defending kikes.


Anonymous 04/08/2018 (Sun) 23:19:25 [Preview] No.1647 del
>>1646
>I am pretty a lot of people
*I am pretty sure a lot of people


Anonymous 04/09/2018 (Mon) 06:27:44 [Preview] No.1651 del
>>1646
>calling himself lucifer and virtuous
Is that a problem?


Anonymous 04/12/2018 (Thu) 20:41:32 [Preview] No.1679 del
>>1651
Actually if i can think outside of my christian mindset if there is merit to luciferianism or lucifer in general than the fact that freemasons are monopolizing it against the people as a torturous thing secretly makes it almost impossible to ever want to know the merits of said luciferianism. I have a hard time believing there is any rebellious spirit in freemasons seeing they are in a cult. Things like this make it a problem There are hierarchies and things beyond my understanding its a deception. And a shriner saying anything about Lucifer is a part of that deception.


Look lucifer was cast out of heaven that was probably stressful to say the least. Now we have sauntering freemasons winking at each other and at that point its about themselves not lucifer. He fell from the sky so masons could call themselves lucifer?


Anonymous 04/13/2018 (Fri) 03:55:11 [Preview] No.1693 del
>>1679
> if i can think outside of my christian mindset
Why?
>lucifer was cast out of heaven
Nigga what? Where does it say that in the Bible? Or is this still "outside the Christian mindset"?


Anonymous 04/13/2018 (Fri) 15:55:03 [Preview] No.1695 del
>>1694
That's talking about the King of Babylon for Isaiah, and Adam/mankind in general for Ezekiel, though, not some kind of "lucifer". And the bit from Job is just all messed up on both sides.
They also get it wrong in saying the serpent tempted Adam and Eve with the desire to become God.
Basically, that page is a very poor reading of any Bible.


Anonymous 04/13/2018 (Fri) 17:42:02 [Preview] No.1698 del
>>1693
I need to read the bible more a lot of that was just speculation without biblical or historical basis.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 05:18:11 [Preview] No.1707 del
>>1695
From the kike who thinks that Lucifer fucked apes to make white people, your whole interpretation of the bible is 100% unverifiable and speculative.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 06:01:03 [Preview] No.1709 del
>>1707
>Lucifer fucked apes to make white people
I think you're confusing me for the Ancient Aliens guy. "Lucifer" isn't a character, after all.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 07:43:04 [Preview] No.1710 del
>>1709
>Lucifer's not in the bible
>denies all parts of the bible that shows dual symbolism
>denies Lucifer is Satan
What next, are you going to make the dumb claim that Jesus is Lucifer or something to that effect?


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 09:12:11 [Preview] No.1711 del
>>1710
>Lucifer's not in the bible
The word is in the Bible, sure. But outside of the KJV, show it referring to a singular character.
>denies all parts of the bible that shows dual symbolism
No?
>denies Lucifer is Satan
Well yea, that's just according to the Bible.
>Jesus is Lucifer
>dumb claim
So you haven't read the Bible? I'd recommend you do that first before you make silly assertions like thinking an adjective is a character.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 11:11:58 [Preview] No.1712 del
>>1711
>adjective
I'm not very experienced with Hebrew and Greek but using dictionaries hâlal would be the adjective and hêylêl translated as Lucifer has the 'êl' stem at the end of it same as any other 'êl' names, at least in transcription because hebrew seems to lack the aleph that is otherwise present in these names.
Septuagint translates it as heōsphóros on it's own an adjective or title (no capital letters in ancient greek but nowadays it's written with capital case). Meaning is Dawnbringer, title for Venus at sunrise, also known as Morning Star. When you have association with Venus it's only few steps from Saturn.
Interesting that morning star or dawning star appears also in Job 38:7 in plural as 'dawn stars' singing with joy during creation (also mentioning sons of god bene ha elohim next to them) and then in Revelation 2:28 has 'star of dawn' being given as a reward and Jesus calling himself 'bright and dawn star' at 22:16 so there are several things in the Bible called morning stars.

>Well yea, that's just according to the Bible.
As far as considering concept of Satan stricte biblical maybe but otherwise no. Occultic lore and Biblical narrative presents roughly similar characters however, what both call good and evil differs.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 17:53:15 [Preview] No.1713 del
>>1712
> hâlal would be the adjective and hêylêl
It's not really that simple, because Hebrew has no vowels. So you have to go off context, and with that in mind, it's never used as a name.
>When you have association with Venus it's only few steps from Saturn.
That's being unkind to the Roman Pantheon, as well as being quite a stretch. As in, not only is it an illogical leap, but in that mythos, the Titans were quite separate and antagonistic to the rest.
>so there are several things in the Bible called morning stars
Exactly. Another reason why the KJV mistranslation is so odd, and the meme sticking around for so long is just uncanny.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 19:45:31 [Preview] No.1715 del
Jesus is that bright and morning star!

Here are some links:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09410a.htm

The name Lucifer originally denotes the planet Venus, emphasizing its brilliance. The Vulgate employs the word also for "the light of the morning" (Job 11:17), "the signs of the zodiac" (Job 38:32), and "the aurora" (Psalm 109:3). Metaphorically, the word is applied to the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12) as preeminent among the princes of his time; to the high priest Simon son of Onias (Ecclesiasticus 50:6), for his surpassing virtue, to the glory of heaven (Apocalypse 2:28), by reason of its excellency; finally to Jesus Christ himself (2 Peter 1:19; Apocalypse 22:16; the "Exultet" of Holy Saturday) the true light of our spiritual life.

The Syriac version and the version of Aquila derive the Hebrew noun helel from the verb yalal, "to lament"; St. Jerome agrees with them (In Isaiah 1.14), and makes Lucifer the name of the principal fallen angel who must lament the loss of his original glory bright as the morning star. In Christian tradition this meaning of Lucifer has prevailed; the Fathers maintain that Lucifer is not the proper name of the devil, but denotes only the state from which he has fallen (Petavius, De Angelis, III, iii, 4).


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 19:52:35 [Preview] No.1716 del
http://www.newadvent.org/bible/2pe001.htm#vrs19

16 Non enim doctas fabulas secuti notam fecimus vobis Domini nostri Jesu Christi virtutem et præsentiam: sed speculatores facti illius magnitudinis. 17 Accipiens enim a Deo Patre honorem et gloriam, voce delapsa ad eum hujuscemodi a magnifica gloria: Hic est Filius meus dilectus, in quo mihi complacui, ipsum audite. 18 Et hanc vocem nos audivimus de cælo allatam, cum essemus cum ipso in monte sancto. 19 Et habemus firmiorem propheticum sermonem: cui benefacitis attendentes quasi lucernæ lucenti in caliginoso loco donec dies elucescat, et lucifer oriatur in cordibus vestris:

16 We were not crediting fables of man’s invention, when we preached to you about the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, and about his coming; we had been eye-witnesses of his exaltation. 17 Such honour, such glory was bestowed on him by God the Father, that a voice came to him out of the splendour which dazzles human eyes; This, it said, is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; to him, then, listen.[5] 18 We, his companions on the holy mountain, heard that voice coming from heaven, 19 and now the word of the prophets gives us more confidence than ever.[6] It is with good reason that you are paying so much attention to that word; it will go on shining, like a lamp in some darkened room, until the dawn breaks, and the day-star rises in your hearts.

May Lucifer Arise in your hearts...it's literally in the bible.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 19:58:07 [Preview] No.1717 del
13 I am Alpha, I am Omega, I am before all, I am at the end of all, the beginning of all things and their end. 14 Blessed are those who wash their garments in the blood of the Lamb; so they will have access to the tree which gives life, and find their way through the gates into the city.[5] 15 No room there for prowling dogs, for sorcerers and wantons and murderers and idolaters, for anyone who loves falsehood and lives in it. 16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you the assurance of this in your churches; I, the root, I, the offspring of David’s race, I, the bright star that brings in the day. 17 The Spirit and my bride bid me come; let everyone who hears this read out say, Come. Come, you who are thirsty, take, you who will, the water of life; it is my free gift.


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 20:07:10 [Preview] No.1718 del
http://www.newadvent.org/bible/rev022.htm#vrs16


Being a light bringer / bearer is bad right? But who brings the light but JESUS CHRIST?

I am the light of the world.

http://www.newadvent.org/bible/joh001.htm

1 At the beginning of time the Word already was; and God had the Word abiding with him, and the Word was God. 2 He abode, at the beginning of time, with God. 3 It was through him that all things came into being, and without him came nothing that has come to be. 4 In him there was life, and that life was the light of men.[1] 5 And the light shines in darkness, a darkness which was not able to master it.[2]

6 A man appeared, sent from God, whose name was John. 7 He came for a witness, to bear witness of the light, so that through him all men might learn to believe. 8 He was not the Light; he was sent to bear witness to the light. 9 There is one who enlightens every soul born into the world; he was the true Light. 10 He, through whom the world was made, was in the world, and the world treated him as a stranger. 11 He came to what was his own, and they who were his own gave him no welcome. 12 But all those who did welcome him, he empowered to become the children of God, all those who believe in his name; 13 their birth came, not from human stock, not from nature’s will or man’s, but from God.[3] 14 And the Word was made flesh, and came to dwell among us; and we had sight of his glory, glory such as belongs to the Father’s only-begotten Son, full of grace and truth. 15 We have John’s witness to him; I told you, cried John, there was one coming after me who takes rank before me; he was when I was not. 16 We have all received something out of his abundance, grace answering to grace. 17 Through Moses the law was given to us; through Jesus Christ grace came to us, and truth. 18 No man has ever seen God; but now his only-begotten Son, who abides in the bosom of the Father, has himself become our interpreter.[4]


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 20:10:42 [Preview] No.1719 del
Come and join us and worship the light bringer Jesus Christ, and drink his blood and eat his flesh! Least you have no life in you. Drink the blood of the son of man and eat his flesh and you shall have ETERNAL LIFE!


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 20:29:12 [Preview] No.1720 del
Modern Catholic Dictionary
Father John Hardon S.J.

http://www.therealpresence.org/cgi-bin/getdefinition.pl

LUCIFER. The name is sometimes applied to a king of Babylon (Isaiah 14:12), but the Fathers of the Church commonly identify Lucifer with Satan, leader of the fallen angels. In the Church's writings it is a synonym for the devil, the Prince of Darkness, who before he fell was an angel of light.In the Scriptures, Christ is also called Phosphoros – Light-Bearer =(II Peter 1:19). (Etym. Latin lucifer, light-bearer.)


Anonymous 04/14/2018 (Sat) 20:35:15 [Preview] No.1721 del
wash their garments in the blood of the Lamb

I have bathed in the BLOOD OF THE LAMB and Now I'm free from sin! I can fuck in orgies, and I get to go to heaven, I'm a wicked sinner, but no stain of sin shall be upon me. JESUS is my shield from the punishment, his BLOOD washes the sins away. JESUS the bright and morning star, the sacrificial LAMB OF GOD, who takes away the sins of the world, HAVE MERCY ON US!. DRINK HIS BLOOD and EAT HIS FLESH and GAIN ETERNAL LIFE!

FREEDOM FROM SIN THROUGH THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB!!=

BATHE IN THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB!!

JOIN US


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 00:32:26 [Preview] No.1722 del
>>1712
Hebrew does have vowels and it's context sensitive. The bible doesn't really care about the "Roman Pantheon", while trying to literally associate Jesus as male version of Venus/Ishtar/Ashtaroth as Hesperus, a Greek deity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesperus which is also Shahar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahar_(god) tied to Ishtar/Ashtar/Athtar Blaming the KJV for what's also in the Douay Rheims goes to show that old English translations regardless of Protestant or Catholic only used "Lucifer" just once in the bible to describe "son of the morning"(KJV) or "who didst rise in the morning" (Douay Rheims). The Douay Rheims also make use of "Morning Star" in other places but doesn't make the claim that the Lucifer mentioned only once in the bible is the same as the "morning star" used in other places in the bible because it is very context specific and to break up the context, every other instance of "morning star" isn't treated the same. https://douayrheimsbible.com/search?query=morning+star The morning stars in Job is only used once that way so it's differentiated from morning star plural, which the context used in Job is contextually about a class of angels, while the use of it in the book of Revelation is not in the context of a class of angels, nor is it a claim that the Lucifer mentioned in Isaiah 14 is by any stretch of the imagination the same lucifer used. Lowercase l lucifer is not "O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning" which if you have read Isaiah 14, Isaiah compares the pagan Lucifer as the King of Babylon LATER, after condemning Lucifer which is the god that the King of Babylon served. https://douayrheimsbible.com/isaiah-14 The uppercase L Lucifer is used as a name, not just a mere title or descriptor. (cont.)


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 00:33:09 [Preview] No.1723 del
>>1712


The whole Lucifer is Jesus bullshit is really stupid, it's also bullshit even using a Catholic bible.

11 Thy pride is brought down to hell, thy carcass is fallen down: under thee shall the moth be strewed, and worms shall be thy covering.
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?
13 And thou saidst in thy heart: I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God, I will sit in the mountain of the covenant, in the sides of the north.
14 I will ascend above the height of the clouds, I will be like the most High.
15 But yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, into the depth of the pit.
16 They that shall see thee, shall turn toward thee, and behold thee. Is this the man that troubled the earth, that shook kingdoms,
17 That made the world a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof, that opened not the prison to his prisoners?

Lucifer here was looking for someone that can go against God and merely used the King of Babylon as the means to do so. Many people out there are too stupid to understand how to read the bible. The stupid anon that you're talking to is a Luciferian and a Satanist, they're both two sides of the same kike inversion of what the bible says for itself which unfortunately many lack the discernment to do it right. The whole transubstantiation thing (please look it up) is the huge fallacy that was assumed to be formed from a merger of the Roman Mithras (not the same as the Persian Mitra cult) cult with the third century Christians in Constantinople that tried to reinterpret the bible, pushing the nonsense that there's literal flesh and literal blood in the bread and wine. There is a probable correlation with the Roman Mithras cult had pushed for a Sacramental Mystery over the Historical Recital used throughout the bible. http://www.hccentral.com/eller9/chap1.html

The anon contradicts himself here using a Jesuit source >>1720 and must I remind you what Jesuitical means and how the Jews are among the Jesuits? And here's the stupid anon wanting to fuck in orgies >>1721. Go ahead and ban that anon, he'll be back again, he's the same anti christian spamming anon from /pol/. Save these posts, you'll want to keep it to remind yourself to not fall for Catholicism/Luciferian/Satanist shitposters.


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 01:34:51 [Preview] No.1725 del
http://biblehub.com/john/6-53.htm

King James Bible
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 01:55:27 [Preview] No.1726 del
>>1723
Do you mock the words of our lord and savior?


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 02:35:37 [Preview] No.1727 del
King James Bible
http://biblehub.com/john/6-48.htm
John 6:48-6:66

I am that bread of life.
Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.
Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?
When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
From that moment many of his disciples turned back and no longer accompanied him. John 6:66


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 04:34:51 [Preview] No.1728 del
>>1725
>>1726
>>1727
It's not literal, you don't actually eat flesh and blood to be saved. Nobody ate the physical flesh and drank the physical blood of Jesus. Nobody back then literally treated the symbolism of bread and wine to be physically taken as if it was 100% real physical flesh and blood. The symbolism is a historical recital and multilayered symbolism of the death of the sacrificial laws ending in Jesus Christ. It is done in remembrance of Jesus of what he had done on the cross, as well as tying that with old testament symbolism. You don't have to do communion to be saved, sacramentalism is a huge doctrinal error. You also don't include the two verses after John 6:66 which shows that the 12 disciples didn't leave which then makes those "disciples" in John 6:66 to NOT be the main 12 but some other people that were following Jesus. The real symbolism is the death to the self. The real blood baptism is to take upon the cross that Jesus gives to Christians as they get martyred by those that accepts his true gospel message. Nobody literally dips themselves into blood to get saved. The only physical sacrifice necessary after Jesus' crucifixion, resurrection, ascension is yourself, the flesh, the part of the body tempted by sin. That flesh will inevitably die but the Christians that seek life through death through the life gained through the death in Jesus Christ who isn't Lucifer son of the morning, satan, that old serpent. Those without the Holy Spirit has no salvation for their soul, will not return to God. Those without the Holy Spirit has no discernment in what the bible says, cannot properly understand the very bible that they claim to understand. To such swine, I don't throw pearls to.


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 04:38:14 [Preview] No.1729 del
>>1728
>The real blood baptism is to take upon the cross that Jesus gives to Christians as they get martyred by those that accepts his true gospel message.

EDIT: The real blood baptism is to take upon the cross that Jesus gives to Christians as they get martyred AS those that accepts his true gospel message attacked BY those that rejects his true gospel message.


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 04:46:52 [Preview] No.1730 del
The core problem of sacramentalism and transubstantiation is that their excessively physical interpretation implies that there's just nobody alive that has ever received "salvation" because nobody had ever physically eaten the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ and are merely pretending to do so, while Satanists and Luciferians drink animal or human flesh and blood thinking that act itself would save them. No, that's not the point, and to miss the real point is the utter failure of your own self from ever understanding God. People that reject the real gospel condemn themselves in perpetual depravity and misguided thinking. God predestined those who will be saved, but have not predestine those who won't be saved. Humanity just can't save themselves outside of God no matter how hard they try.


Anonymous 04/15/2018 (Sun) 14:07:49 [Preview] No.1732 del
>>1723
>Lucifer here
Wrong. Read it again.


Anonymous 04/16/2018 (Mon) 05:55:00 [Preview] No.1742 del
>>1732
I read it again, you're the one wrong about calling this interpretation wrong, but no amount of me telling you this will ever change a stubborn person.

You ignore the context of the bible like Ezekiel 28 and Luke 10:18 to name a couple, as well as why Lucifer became Satan.

Lucifer as a name is not lucifer as a title, the real lucifer as a title is Jesus Christ, the fallen cherub, but Jesus isn't literally Venus. The Lucifer as a name became Satan, the devil, and took upon himself the form of a serpent that had later on lost his legs, cursed to eat the dirt/flesh/world that he wanted to take over.

You 👏 Are 👏 Not 👏 A 👏 Christian 👏

Submit to the will of God or be destroyed by your own will, pride of life ever so temporary which your punishment is ever so permanent.


Anonymous 04/16/2018 (Mon) 05:57:24 [Preview] No.1743 del
>>1742
>Lucifer as a name is not lucifer as a title, the real lucifer as a title is Jesus Christ, the fallen cherub, but Jesus isn't literally Venus.

Lucifer the falen cherub as a name is not lucifer as a title, the real lucifer as a title is Jesus Christ, but Jesus isn't literally Venus.


Anonymous 04/16/2018 (Mon) 07:51:25 [Preview] No.1745 del
>>1742
>but no amount of me telling you this will ever change a stubborn person.
So it would seem.
>You ignore the context of the bible like Ezekiel 28
Which is about the King of Tyre.
>and Luke 10:18
Doesn't actually say lucifer (morning star / herald of Heavenly light), instead satan (adversary).
>Lucifer as a name is
...not in the Bible? Basically, you're getting this from one misprinted (KJV) edition.
>You 👏 Are 👏 Not 👏 A 👏 Christian 👏
That's not for you to judge, unless you're claiming to be God. Also, this isn't twitter.


Anonymous 04/17/2018 (Tue) 02:26:24 [Preview] No.1750 del
The religious back and forth reminds me of this question:
How do you discern truth to religious matters in the occult deception?


Or rather Do you have to use religion to find truth of the occult deception as with the name of Jesus Christ , What would jesus do, Eyes to see and ears to hear, etc?


Anonymous 04/17/2018 (Tue) 05:28:30 [Preview] No.1751 del
>>1750
What is the source of the mythology surrounding Lucifer and his angels and the fall from heaven and rebellion etc. Because none of that is in the bible. Where does this come from? The book of Enoch? what are the main sources of this mythology. Five lines from Isaiah about the King of Babylon (Re translated from Hebrew and replacing words to fit this paradigm) did not create this entire mythology. Where is it sourced from? Find that information out tell us about it and link to the source documents.


Anonymous 04/17/2018 (Tue) 08:22:04 [Preview] No.1752 del
>>1745
You do not understand biblical prophecy and symbolism. You do not know that a Christian can rebuke other Christians should they refuse to repent from their heresy. You do not know that the de facto prince of the world is Satan of which you serve "nature". You cannot use your line of logic to prove that Jesus is God, let alone, even believe that to be so because you compartmentalize where it isn't allowable. You do not know the relation of God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit which was prophesied from the old testament and affirmed in the new testament. The God of the Old Testament is the same God of the New Testament. The failure to see the synergy of the Old and the New is also the failure to understand what concepts in the bible are applicable to Christians and how laws were even formed which is revealed in plain sight yet is never understood by many. Because you don't understand God's true nature, you don't know nature's true God and instead serve a false god made from dirt: yourself, which you will be taken over by Satan, becoming Satan against God, just as Lucifer rejected God for his own pride. Go ahead, try and save yourself, but it is very clear to me that you have not accepted the true gospel message and so you are not a Christian.


Anonymous 04/17/2018 (Tue) 08:29:10 [Preview] No.1753 del
>>1750
You either get it or you don't. Just as you can't teach "morality" to people that'll seek to sin without any laws forbidding it and restricting them in fear of their own life, most people are just naturally evil. Only those with morals can correct their children correctly and righteously, while the evil will seek to abuse, rape, murder, consume, destroy their children and others along with them. That's really just how this fallen world works. This is why authority is necessary to bring judgement to the wicked, yet of course at the same time people are controlled by evil authority. Resisting evil is what only those with morals have, while those without morals but lack power tend to do nothing or seek to gain power among them which those that a drawn to false power are the fools attracted to evil, people like freemasons, kabbalistic jews, etc.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply